Of course, some factors work the other way: the largest cities are generally better connected, and the very rich can overcome their cost disadvantages, which deter the merely affluent.Beijing has risen to the top five in Kearney's "2020 Global Cities Index (GCI)" as it has shown strong and balanced improvements in various aspects as compared with other cities globally, said Jefferson Wang, global partner at Kearney. The logical extension of that is that cities with a high quality of life should, over time, move up the rankings for global influence. And global communications have made it easier to do business remotely. And the most global centres are far from the most liveable.ĭecision-makers and the wealthy presumably value lifestyle. None of Mercer’s top five cities features in A.T. A good lifestyle doesn’t match with global prominence. ![]() Mercer’s report on the quality of life offers a different view of the future. Chief among these are Beijing and Shanghai, where rising wealth, expanding infrastructure and improving business conditions may well outweigh negatives like pollution and the political environment. The lead of the top few over the rest suggests the Big Apple, London and the rest won’t be dethroned quickly.īut in a decade or two, the survey reckons, cities that are now emerging could reach the top of the list. ![]() ![]() These factors naturally favour big cities, so the dominance of melting-pot metropolises isn’t surprising. Kearney’s survey measures business activity, human capital, information exchange, culture and political engagement. People pass by Austria's central bank (OeNB) building in Vienna June 9, 2009.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |